Comments on: ‘Court document swears Kenyan birth cert legit’ http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/09/court-document-swears-kenyan-birth-cert-legit/ The Anti-Obama Blog Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:54:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: smrstrauss http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/09/court-document-swears-kenyan-birth-cert-legit/comment-page-1/#comment-3801 smrstrauss Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:28:45 +0000 http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=974#comment-3801 Re: "There has to be a reason why he will not release any documents.' Obama has posted and shown to both Polifact and Fact check the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and the facts on it, that he was born in Hawaii, have been confirmed twice by the authorities in Hawaii. Re: “There has to be a reason why he will not release any documents.’

Obama has posted and shown to both Polifact and Fact check the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and the facts on it, that he was born in Hawaii, have been confirmed twice by the authorities in Hawaii.

]]> By: E Williams http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/09/court-document-swears-kenyan-birth-cert-legit/comment-page-1/#comment-3800 E Williams Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:21:06 +0000 http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=974#comment-3800 Thank you very much for what you are doing. I wanted this to happen for a very long time. There has to be a reason why he will not release any documents. Thank you very much for what you are doing.
I wanted this to happen for a very long time. There has to be a reason why he will not release any documents.

]]> By: smrstrauss http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/09/court-document-swears-kenyan-birth-cert-legit/comment-page-1/#comment-3799 smrstrauss Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:56:36 +0000 http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=974#comment-3799 Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a “natural born citizen,” no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama’s claim to a Hawaiian birth. No controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Bush's claim to Connecticut birth or Clinton's to birth in Arkansas or FDR's to birth in New York or JFK's to birth in Massachusetts However, two officials of the State of Hawaii have looked into Obama's birth certificate file and confirmed the facts on his certificate that he was born in Hawaii on the date mentioned. (http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/11/obama_hawaaianborn_citizen_for.html), and there is even a witness who recalls being told of his birth in Hawaii in 1961. (http://www.buffalonews.com/494/story/554495.html) Re: "same “short-form” document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii." Not true. Only children born IN Hawaii can receive a birth document saying "born in Hawaii." When Obama was born in 1961, it was not possible to register a foreign birth AT ALL. That was not passed until 1982. The Lucas Smith "birth certificate" is an obvious forgery. One way to tell is the format of the two dates on the document that follow the slash format. In the Smith document these two dates follow US order: month/day/year. But both Kenya and Britain have always used day/month/year. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date#dd.2Fmm.2Fyyyy_or_dd.mm.yyyy_.28day.2C_month.2C_year.29) Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a “natural born citizen,” no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama’s claim to a Hawaiian birth.

No controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Bush’s claim to Connecticut birth or Clinton’s to birth in Arkansas or FDR’s to birth in New York or JFK’s to birth in Massachusetts

However, two officials of the State of Hawaii have looked into Obama’s birth certificate file and confirmed the facts on his certificate that he was born in Hawaii on the date mentioned. (http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/11/obama_hawaaianborn_citizen_for.html), and there is even a witness who recalls being told of his birth in Hawaii in 1961. (http://www.buffalonews.com/494/story/554495.html)

Re: “same “short-form” document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii.” Not true. Only children born IN Hawaii can receive a birth document saying “born in Hawaii.” When Obama was born in 1961, it was not possible to register a foreign birth AT ALL. That was not passed until 1982.

The Lucas Smith “birth certificate” is an obvious forgery. One way to tell is the format of the two dates on the document that follow the slash format. In the Smith document these two dates follow US order: month/day/year. But both Kenya and Britain have always used day/month/year. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date#dd.2Fmm.2Fyyyy_or_dd.mm.yyyy_.28day.2C_month.2C_year.29)

]]>