<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Answers Planted Questions In News Conferences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/06/obama-answers-planted-questions-in-news-conferences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/06/obama-answers-planted-questions-in-news-conferences/</link>
	<description>The Anti-Obama Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:54:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/06/obama-answers-planted-questions-in-news-conferences/comment-page-1/#comment-3307</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=666#comment-3307</guid>
		<description>I enjoy the blog but I&#039;m a bit confused. From all reports (even yours), the Huffington Post question was not prearranged with the White House, it was only agreed that Obama would call on Nico Pitney for a question from Iranians. Maybe he was expecting a question that would allow him to highlight his support for Iranians, but it was actually the most difficult question he attempted to answer. 

Since you don&#039;t mention it in your blog, it was: “Under which conditions would you accept the election of Ahmadinejad, and if you do accept it without any significant changes in the conditions there, isn&#039;t that a betrayal of the — of what the demonstrators there are working towards?”

Obama&#039;s answer betrayed the fact that, even if the administration truly believes Iran&#039;s election was a fraud, they aren&#039;t willing to stand by that conviction and refuse to recognize Ahmadinejad&#039;s election, just as the administration is happy to publicly denounce the coup in Honduras but is unwilling to officially call it a coup (in that case, because then we&#039;d be legally bound to stop sending military aide to the new junta).

My point to you is that it is seems inaccurate to title your post  with a mention of &quot;planted questions&quot; only to clear up later that it&#039;s only a preplanned questioner asking an unplanned question. Then you describe as hypocrisy the reaction to the previous administration when it quietly got someone who wasn&#039;t even a blogger (let alone a journalist) to ask a preplanned question -- a scenario that is far more of a &quot;plant&quot; than Nico Pitney, not to mention the fake press conference after Katrina where ALL of the questions were preplanned. Aside from the fact that Pitney&#039;s question was not a disgusting softball, another striking difference that deflates your hypocrisy charge is the fact that the arrangement was up front and instead of unspoken with the hope no one would notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy the blog but I&#8217;m a bit confused. From all reports (even yours), the Huffington Post question was not prearranged with the White House, it was only agreed that Obama would call on Nico Pitney for a question from Iranians. Maybe he was expecting a question that would allow him to highlight his support for Iranians, but it was actually the most difficult question he attempted to answer. </p>
<p>Since you don&#8217;t mention it in your blog, it was: “Under which conditions would you accept the election of Ahmadinejad, and if you do accept it without any significant changes in the conditions there, isn&#8217;t that a betrayal of the — of what the demonstrators there are working towards?”</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s answer betrayed the fact that, even if the administration truly believes Iran&#8217;s election was a fraud, they aren&#8217;t willing to stand by that conviction and refuse to recognize Ahmadinejad&#8217;s election, just as the administration is happy to publicly denounce the coup in Honduras but is unwilling to officially call it a coup (in that case, because then we&#8217;d be legally bound to stop sending military aide to the new junta).</p>
<p>My point to you is that it is seems inaccurate to title your post  with a mention of &#8220;planted questions&#8221; only to clear up later that it&#8217;s only a preplanned questioner asking an unplanned question. Then you describe as hypocrisy the reaction to the previous administration when it quietly got someone who wasn&#8217;t even a blogger (let alone a journalist) to ask a preplanned question &#8212; a scenario that is far more of a &#8220;plant&#8221; than Nico Pitney, not to mention the fake press conference after Katrina where ALL of the questions were preplanned. Aside from the fact that Pitney&#8217;s question was not a disgusting softball, another striking difference that deflates your hypocrisy charge is the fact that the arrangement was up front and instead of unspoken with the hope no one would notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

