<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo of Obama Smoking Marijuana? Obama Admits Marijuana and Cocaine Use.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/</link>
	<description>The Anti-Obama Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:54:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>Ask him if he is a comunist , if he says no then he is a liar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask him if he is a comunist , if he says no then he is a liar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dadeeda</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-4036</link>
		<dc:creator>dadeeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-4036</guid>
		<description>I just couldn&#039;t resist responding to the blogger who said Obama was a liar that needed a teleprompter. Well.....my response is who are you comparing him too? He&#039;s a liar compared to Bush 1 or 2? or are you comparing him to Regan or Clinton. At the end of their terms, they  were all found to be vicious liars caught in the act publicly and privately. I get so tired of people throwing out vicious rumors about someone who at the time you blogged hat only been in office about 45days. If he&#039;s a liar, please tell us what he&#039;s lied about. As far as the teleprompter, if you think you could do his job and not refer or use a tool to help you remember the tons of information that has been thrown at you that day (because believe it or not, there aint nobody smart enough to remember a 30 or 40 minutes speech by heart in the amount of time he has to study). But I guess it was ok with you when the dumbest president on earth, President Bush probably used a teleprompter when he spoke to his wife. So if Obama needs one to refer to when he clearly and eloquately informing this nation of what he is trying to accomplish (after the Bush, Clinton, Bush fallout), then I would rather him use it than not and mis- inform us like past presidents did. (Shout out to &quot;the Gipper&quot;) with his crazy ass (May he rest in peace)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just couldn&#8217;t resist responding to the blogger who said Obama was a liar that needed a teleprompter. Well&#8230;..my response is who are you comparing him too? He&#8217;s a liar compared to Bush 1 or 2? or are you comparing him to Regan or Clinton. At the end of their terms, they  were all found to be vicious liars caught in the act publicly and privately. I get so tired of people throwing out vicious rumors about someone who at the time you blogged hat only been in office about 45days. If he&#8217;s a liar, please tell us what he&#8217;s lied about. As far as the teleprompter, if you think you could do his job and not refer or use a tool to help you remember the tons of information that has been thrown at you that day (because believe it or not, there aint nobody smart enough to remember a 30 or 40 minutes speech by heart in the amount of time he has to study). But I guess it was ok with you when the dumbest president on earth, President Bush probably used a teleprompter when he spoke to his wife. So if Obama needs one to refer to when he clearly and eloquately informing this nation of what he is trying to accomplish (after the Bush, Clinton, Bush fallout), then I would rather him use it than not and mis- inform us like past presidents did. (Shout out to &#8220;the Gipper&#8221;) with his crazy ass (May he rest in peace)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cdub</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-3977</link>
		<dc:creator>Cdub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-3977</guid>
		<description>Kudos to him, Life is short, so make it sweet...Marijuana does not make you unintelligent, unintelligence is the failure or resistance to recognize the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to him, Life is short, so make it sweet&#8230;Marijuana does not make you unintelligent, unintelligence is the failure or resistance to recognize the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taz</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>taz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>that is obama geting high thats weed theres no lie look at the poic hes eyes you can tell he is blow so stop say he doint get high becuase he do get hgh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is obama geting high thats weed theres no lie look at the poic hes eyes you can tell he is blow so stop say he doint get high becuase he do get hgh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pizark2</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>pizark2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-1854</guid>
		<description>those guys were white
if not for the deep seeded racial issues,it would have been more than 10%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those guys were white<br />
if not for the deep seeded racial issues,it would have been more than 10%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but winning by 6% is not a landslide; a strong win maybe, but certainly not a landslide like Reagan&#039;s 10%+ wins. Reagan, Nixon and Bush Sr. had landslide wins... and if you want to claim that Bush Jr. &quot;stole&quot; the election, I can much more easily and rationally claim that Obama BOUGHT it. And work on your spelling and grammar before you call us dumb***es. Funny to that you buy into unsupported rumors about Bush but ignore the facts about Obama. Oh, and I wouldn&#039;t care really if most of the comments on this site were from Obama supporters (which would probably mean I was doing a better job) but that&#039;s definitely not true.
 &lt;p&gt;&#160;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/11/06/obamas-great-win-not-so-great-really/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s Great Win? Not So Great, Really.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &#160;
&lt;p&gt;The near orgasmic reaction in the media to Barack Obama’s win on Election-day is universal. His is being hailed as a mandate, a game changing win, a landslide. But, in reality, Obama’s “wind” was not as “righteous” as he thought, it was not a landslide at all. In fact, Obama’s isn’t as strong a win as Ronald Reagan’s or Nixon’s and it didn’t bring the mandate for Obama that the media is attempting to claim it did. Neither did Obama bring overwhelming numbers to the polls as everyone imagined, for that matter. In the end, the complete realignment for the Democrats did not occur. All Obama’s win revealed is that the American electorate is still closely divided and it also that the GOP has one more chance to make a come back.
&lt;p&gt; &#160;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Not a Landslide&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &#160;
&lt;p&gt;Reagan won a landslide victory in 1980. Obama did not in 2008. Reagan beat incumbent Jimmy Carter with nearly 51% to Carter’s 41% of the vote in November of 1980. He won 489 to Carter’s 49 Electoral College votes. Now that is what a landslide looks like.
&lt;p&gt; &#160;
&lt;p&gt;Obama’s victory is solid, yes, but not of Reagan’s caliber. Obama got 52% of the vote to McCain’s 46% and garnered 349 Electoral Votes to McCain’s 163. But, while strong, Obama did not do better than George H. W. Bush or either Reagan campaign. Obama also came nowhere near Nixon’s landslide win of 1972.
&lt;p&gt; &#160;
&lt;p&gt;Obama did much better than Bill Clinton and both of G. W. Bush’s campaigns, for sure. But, with all the hype attached to Obama, with all the claims that he was bringing massive new numbers of voters to the table, to only beat McCain by 6% does not seem quite as amazing as Reagan’s win of 10% over Carter. Nor was his Electoral Count better than Reagan’s, or Bush the elder’s, or Nixon’s. McCain, it must be recognized, almost got 50% of the vote here...
&lt;p&gt; &#160;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vote Turnout Not a Record&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &#160;
&lt;p&gt;The highest turn out of voters was the 1960 race between JFK and Nixon. 63.8 percent of registered voters turned out to vote that year. While Obama saw a healthy 62.5 percent turnout, still it was also lower than that of 1964. Obama’s turn out did not set the highest total record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but winning by 6% is not a landslide; a strong win maybe, but certainly not a landslide like Reagan&#8217;s 10%+ wins. Reagan, Nixon and Bush Sr. had landslide wins&#8230; and if you want to claim that Bush Jr. &#8220;stole&#8221; the election, I can much more easily and rationally claim that Obama BOUGHT it. And work on your spelling and grammar before you call us dumb***es. Funny to that you buy into unsupported rumors about Bush but ignore the facts about Obama. Oh, and I wouldn&#8217;t care really if most of the comments on this site were from Obama supporters (which would probably mean I was doing a better job) but that&#8217;s definitely not true.</p>
<p>&nbsp;
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/11/06/obamas-great-win-not-so-great-really/" rel="nofollow">Obama&#8217;s Great Win? Not So Great, Really.</a>
</p>
<p> &nbsp;
</p>
<p>The near orgasmic reaction in the media to Barack Obama’s win on Election-day is universal. His is being hailed as a mandate, a game changing win, a landslide. But, in reality, Obama’s “wind” was not as “righteous” as he thought, it was not a landslide at all. In fact, Obama’s isn’t as strong a win as Ronald Reagan’s or Nixon’s and it didn’t bring the mandate for Obama that the media is attempting to claim it did. Neither did Obama bring overwhelming numbers to the polls as everyone imagined, for that matter. In the end, the complete realignment for the Democrats did not occur. All Obama’s win revealed is that the American electorate is still closely divided and it also that the GOP has one more chance to make a come back.
</p>
<p> &nbsp;
</p>
<p><strong>Not a Landslide</strong>
</p>
<p> &nbsp;
</p>
<p>Reagan won a landslide victory in 1980. Obama did not in 2008. Reagan beat incumbent Jimmy Carter with nearly 51% to Carter’s 41% of the vote in November of 1980. He won 489 to Carter’s 49 Electoral College votes. Now that is what a landslide looks like.
</p>
<p> &nbsp;
</p>
<p>Obama’s victory is solid, yes, but not of Reagan’s caliber. Obama got 52% of the vote to McCain’s 46% and garnered 349 Electoral Votes to McCain’s 163. But, while strong, Obama did not do better than George H. W. Bush or either Reagan campaign. Obama also came nowhere near Nixon’s landslide win of 1972.
</p>
<p> &nbsp;
</p>
<p>Obama did much better than Bill Clinton and both of G. W. Bush’s campaigns, for sure. But, with all the hype attached to Obama, with all the claims that he was bringing massive new numbers of voters to the table, to only beat McCain by 6% does not seem quite as amazing as Reagan’s win of 10% over Carter. Nor was his Electoral Count better than Reagan’s, or Bush the elder’s, or Nixon’s. McCain, it must be recognized, almost got 50% of the vote here&#8230;
</p>
<p> &nbsp;
</p>
<p><strong>Vote Turnout Not a Record</strong>
</p>
<p> &nbsp;
</p>
<p>The highest turn out of voters was the 1960 race between JFK and Nixon. 63.8 percent of registered voters turned out to vote that year. While Obama saw a healthy 62.5 percent turnout, still it was also lower than that of 1964. Obama’s turn out did not set the highest total record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>hey i will never check this again i just ahve something to say all you ********* are mad as obama for hype because people like him? because country ellected him by a landslide and he was actually able to win an ellection unlike our former president who just pulled dirty trick thricked you ********* into thinking there was a war we needed to fight next to the country we all but abandoned only months after 9/11 its time people like you open your eyes or move out bush did coke too and he wasnt able to admit it so maybe what your unhappy about is honesty well when you belive in something good you dont have to lie you should give it a shot (isnt it funy most the posts on this thing are from obama supporters)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey i will never check this again i just ahve something to say all you ********* are mad as obama for hype because people like him? because country ellected him by a landslide and he was actually able to win an ellection unlike our former president who just pulled dirty trick thricked you ********* into thinking there was a war we needed to fight next to the country we all but abandoned only months after 9/11 its time people like you open your eyes or move out bush did coke too and he wasnt able to admit it so maybe what your unhappy about is honesty well when you belive in something good you dont have to lie you should give it a shot (isnt it funy most the posts on this thing are from obama supporters)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-915</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t sure at the time of the original posting, but now I know, at least to the best of my knowledge, it is just a cigarette... although I still don&#039;t find it comforting that he would pose for such a shot, obviously intending to make it look like he has a joint, let alone use marijuana and cocaine as he admitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t sure at the time of the original posting, but now I know, at least to the best of my knowledge, it is just a cigarette&#8230; although I still don&#8217;t find it comforting that he would pose for such a shot, obviously intending to make it look like he has a joint, let alone use marijuana and cocaine as he admitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-908</guid>
		<description>You know that&#039;s a cigarette right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that&#8217;s a cigarette right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dadidauda</title>
		<link>http://www.antiobamablog.com/2009/02/photo-of-obama-smoking-marijuana-obama-admits-marijuana-and-cocaine-use/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>dadidauda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiobamablog.com/?p=285#comment-469</guid>
		<description>he is the biggest lier and a fake polititian in the history of US. All he has is a &quot;HIP&quot; look and teleprompters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he is the biggest lier and a fake polititian in the history of US. All he has is a &#8220;HIP&#8221; look and teleprompters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

